On June 16, 2025, the Federal Government of Somalia launched the National Consultation Forum with the aim of advancing constitutional reform and transitioning to a one-person, one-vote (1P1V) electoral system. The initiative, however, sparked significant political division, with Abdirahman Abdishakur Warsame, an opposition MP, and Hassan Moalim Mohamud, the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, each defending their respective positions in articles published by Dawan Africa.
Hassan Moalim Mohamud’s Defense (Government Position)
In his article, Hassan Moalim Mohamud strongly criticized the opposition for boycotting the National Dialogue, claiming that the forum was open and inclusive. He argued that invitations were extended to all political actors, including opposition groups, but their absence was a deliberate choice. He labeled their subsequent criticisms of the process as politically hypocritical, accusing the opposition of opting out of the dialogue and then complaining about being excluded. According to the Minister, the government’s push for 1P1V electoral reform and constitutional amendments was a necessary and transparent step toward a more democratic Somalia. Moalim Mohamud urged the opposition to engage in the process instead of staying on the sidelines, emphasizing that the nation needed their active participation in nation-building.
Abdirahman Abdishakur Warsame’s Defense (Opposition Position)
In contrast, Abdirahman Abdishakur Warsame explained the opposition’s reasons for boycotting the National Dialogue in his article. He accused President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud of orchestrating a “political theater” rather than fostering a genuine and inclusive dialogue. According to Warsame, the forum was dominated by government loyalists, leaving no room for critical voices. He also pointed out that the President’s commitment to 1P1V was misleading because the electoral system still relied on clan-based representation, which contradicted the principle of universal suffrage. Warsame also condemned the unilateral amendments made to the constitution, claiming that these changes were designed to centralize power in the hands of the President and extend his mandate. The opposition’s stance, according to Warsame, was not against reform but was a call for more inclusive, transparent, and genuine negotiations.
Side-by-Side Analysis by Dawan Africa:
This clash between the government and the opposition underscores the polarized political climate in Somalia, where both sides continue to advocate for what they believe is the right path forward for the country’s future. While the government calls for participation and engagement in the National Dialogue, the opposition demands more inclusivity and transparency in the process. How these differing views are reconciled will have a significant impact on Somalia's political stability moving forward.
