November 25, 2025 - When Nikita Bier, X’s head of product, quietly unveiled a new feature over the weekend, he framed it as a simple transparency upgrade. “You can now see the country or region where an account is based,” he wrote on the platform, calling it “an important first step to securing the integrity of the global town square.”
Within hours, that small addition (a tiny location tag on user profile) had detonated into one of the most intense waves of online sleuthing X has seen in years. What began as a product tweak quickly transformed into a global exercise in digital forensics.
Users scoured profiles, cross-checked identities, and shared screenshots of accounts whose locations didn’t match the personas they projected. Some appeared to be influencers who had amassed massive followings under one identity, only for their account region to reveal something entirely different. And just like that, the world had a new window into how online influence really works.
A Feature With outsized Impact
X designed the feature to expose inauthentic behaviour. This targets accounts posing as something they’re not or networks trying to seed narratives across countries. But its impact was immediate and far-reaching because, for the first time, users could pair behavioural anomalies with an apparent geographic origin.
Researchers had suspected overseas networks were influencing online conversations for years, but they relied on subtle clues: timestamp patterns, language irregularities, image reuse, technical artefacts in posts.
Now, they had something concrete. “Before this change we could show these profiles were fake, but we had almost no visibility on where they were run from,” says Benjamin Strick, director of investigations at the Centre for Information Resilience (CIR). “Now we can see many of the accounts in this network are linked to Southeast Asia.”
But transparency comes with risk
The excitement of discovery was quickly tempered by an undercurrent of concern. In a platform as global and politically charged as X, a location tag can be a powerful signal. Sometimes too powerful.
It could become dangerous for activists, journalists, or everyday users in countries where online dissent is punished even though X responded by adding a notice clarifying that locations may be affected by travel or VPN usage and said that users in high-risk countries can limit visibility to a broad region rather than a specific country. With this feature, X might be trading safety for transparency.
Rough edges and a promise of precision
Even Bier himself acknowledged that the feature is not yet perfect. “There are a few rough edges that will be resolved by Tuesday,” he wrote shortly after launch, later promising an upgrade that will bring the accuracy “to nearly 99.99%.”
Users have already noticed inconsistencies; regions appear to change, some accounts have confusing or contradictory labels, and others vanished entirely after being flagged. The location tool exposes the scale of the transparency problem but doesn’t solve it.
For now, the new feature has done something unusual for a social platform: it has peeled back the facade. It has shown that accounts can be far more complex and in some cases, far more coordinated than their profile photos and slogans suggest.
It has also reminded users of something else: behind every handle is a real person, in a real place, with real incentives. And a single line of text beneath a username may be enough to change how millions of people understand the conversations they see every day.

Related Articles

Kenyan Startups Shine as NBA Africa Unveils Top 10 Continental Innovators

LAPSSET Railway Ambition to Juba, South Sudan, and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Faces Reality Check





