Kenya, 22 November 2025 - Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi’s declaration that he will lead the people of Kisumu and the entire Nyanza region to socio-political status which the late Raila Odinga had envisioned, marks one of the clearest signals yet that succession politics in Luo Nyanza has entered a defining phase.
Speaking at an empowerment forum in Kisumu on Friday, CS Mbadi said Odinga bore the brunt of struggle, violence, and sometimes state repression on behalf of his people.
In contrast, Mbadi cast himself not as an imitator, but as a successor tasked with completing the journey through a different path.
This framing serves multiple political purposes.
First, it allows Mbadi to pay homage to Odinga’s stature while simultaneously distinguishing his own leadership identity.
By declaring that “Odinga’s shoes are too big for anyone to wear,” he concedes the uniqueness of the late prime minister’s struggles: the detentions, the tear gas, the bullets, the political betrayals, and the decades-long push for reforms.
Yet by insisting on using his own shoes, he inserts himself into the succession conversation without presenting himself as a clone of the former opposition chief.
It is a delicate balance — reverence without subservience, continuity without imitation.
Second, Mbadi’s message signals a strategic recalibration in Nyanza politics.
He openly rejected calls for a return to street protests, arguing that political parties exist to attain and wield power, not to perpetually demonstrate.
This is a significant departure in a region where political expression has often been tied to activism and confrontation.
By urging the Luo community to work with the current administration rather than oppose it reflexively, Mbadi positioned development, influence, and long-term political bargaining as more valuable than protest symbolism.
This recalibration is closely tied to national political dynamics.
Mbadi’s call for cooperation with the government is part of a broader argument that strategic alignment today can translate into leverage in future elections, including the approaching 2032 contest.
His declaration came alongside monetary contributions to local traders, reinforcing the idea that political engagement with the state can yield tangible benefits.
More from Kenya
The message was clear: development is a more sustainable tool for empowerment than disruptive politics.
However, Mbadi’s stance is not without political risk.
For decades, the Luo community’s political identity has been intertwined with agitation for reforms and unwavering loyalty to Odinga.
Any suggestion of softening that firebrand style of agitation can be interpreted by sections of the electorate as ideological drift or political compromise.
For those who believe that activism remains central to the community’s dignity and bargaining power, Mbadi’s message may appear too accommodating.
Yet, in the broader context of Odinga’s generational transition, Mbadi’s approach appears calculated.
Within the vacuum created by Odinga’s sudden death in October, several leaders are positioning themselves for influence.
Mbadi’s move is a deliberate attempt to anchor his leadership in a narrative of destiny and continuity. It gives his political message emotional weight and symbolic legitimacy, elements that have historically resonated deeply in Luo politics.
At the same time, his emphasis on economic reform and national development reflects his technocratic role in government.
The blend of political symbolism and policy-driven pragmatism suggests he aims to be viewed not only as a successor in rhetoric, but as a leader capable of delivering measurable outcomes. This dual identity — part-political heir, part-technocrat — could become his strongest asset, allowing him to appeal to both the emotionally driven and development-conscious segments of the electorate.
Still, the path ahead is far from certain.
Mbadi must prove that his model of engagement can secure real political gains and uplift his community in ways that justify departing from the activism-infused legacy of the past. His ability to unify the Luo political base, maintain respect for Odinga’s towering legacy, and articulate a compelling forward-looking agenda will determine whether his “own shoes” can indeed carry the community to the envisioned status.
Ultimately, Mbadi’s declaration is more than rhetoric; it is a strategic unveiling of a new political philosophy for Luo Nyanza — one rooted in pragmatism, development, and recalibrated alliances. Whether this approach will resonate widely remains the central question as the region steps into a post-Raila political era.

More from Kenya

Ruth Odinga Banks on Grassroots Mobilisation as She Sharpens Political Career

Migori Senator Backs Ruto, Urges Kenyans to Rally Behind Him





