Somalia, 29 November 2025 - Financial experts in Somalia have raised concerns over the continued ‘de-risking’ measures imposed on the country following new directives from the U.S. government.
Led by Central Bank Governor Abdirahman M. Abdullahi, the experts argue that Somalia’s exclusion from major correspondent banking networks is unjustified and continues to undermine the country’s financial stability.
Governor Abdullahi explained that de-risking, where international banks sever or limit relationships with institutions perceived as high-risk, ultimately works against its intended purpose.
In an article published in The Banker, he warned that de-risking forces financial flows into unregulated or informal channels, reducing transparency and increasing vulnerabilities.
“Reintegrating Somalia’s banking system into correspondent banking networks would restore transparency and ensure that transactions pass through supervised, compliant, and internationally aligned mechanisms,” he said.
The experts stress that reconnecting Somali banks to global financial networks is vital for strengthening the economy, safeguarding remittance flows, and improving the country’s integration into the international financial system.
De-risking, in this context, means that foreign banks may limit, restrict, or completely cut ties with Somalia-based institutions as they are perceived to pose compliance, regulatory, or reputational risks.
Governor Abdullahi highlighted the practical impact of this isolation:
“No Somali bank today can send or receive U.S. dollars directly; all transactions are routed through foreign institutions such as in Kenya, Djibouti, Turkey, or elsewhere in the wider MENA (Middle East and North Africa) or APAC (Asia-Pacific) regions.
More from Somalia
This creates a nested structure that adds cost, delay, and complexity.”
He added that the consequences extend beyond Somalia, harming the transparency and integrity of the global financial system.
The scale of the distortion is evident in the numbers. Somalia receives around $4.2 billion in inflows annually, $1 billion in aid and $3.2 billion in remittances. With intermediary charges averaging a conservative 5 percent, an estimated $210 million is lost each year in fees, funds that could otherwise support energy development, infrastructure projects, or climate resilience initiatives.
A similar pattern is seen in trade. Although Somalia imported an estimated $9.2 billion worth of goods in 2024, less than one-third of these imports were financed through the banking sector. The remainder was handled by money transfer operators or informal channels, which are both more expensive and less transparent. With direct settlement channels in place, a significantly larger share of trade could flow through regulated banks and payment systems.
“This is not a story of lack of capacity,” Abdullahi emphasized, “but of progress that has been overlooked.”
He stressed that Somalia is not seeking exemptions or looser standards.
“Somalia has the road map, the reforms, and the readiness. What it needs now is reconnection. Banks trusted by DFIs (Development Finance Institutions) and international NGOs (Non-governmental Organizations) can become the financial arteries of the Horn of Africa, helping to finance Somalia’s development while shaping one of the world’s most ambitious transformations.”
He added that the benefits extend well beyond Somalia’s borders: “It is in the interest of the global banking community to turn today’s leakage into tomorrow’s leverage.”
More from Somalia

Djibouti Plays Host To EU-Backed Red Sea Security Talks

Security Beefed Up as Ruto Expected to Launch Projects in Masalani, Attend Haji Son’s Wedding


