Few words in modern development discourse have travelled as widely as empowerment. It appears in government speeches, NGO reports, and donor strategies — a term of progress that promises change. Yet in Somalia, empowerment remains mostly a word of aspiration, not transformation.
From Aid Language to Political Currency
The idea of empowerment entered Somalia’s vocabulary through post-war reconstruction programs. Donors urged gender inclusion and youth participation as conditions for assistance. Politicians echoed the language, pledging “women empowerment” and “community inclusion” to appear progressive and attract funds.
But over time, empowerment became a political currency rather than a policy goal. It was used to signal modernity, not to transfer power. The gap between language and reality grew wider, leaving citizens familiar with the word but untouched by its promise.
Representation Without Power
Somalia’s version of empowerment often ends with representation. Women and youth are given seats at the table — but little voice. The women’s quota in parliament, though historic, remains largely symbolic. It grants visibility without authority.
Similarly, youth are hailed as “the future” yet rarely influence the present. Empowerment has turned into representation without redistribution — a photo opportunity rather than a shift in power.
Politics Over Policy
True empowerment requires stable laws and functioning institutions. In Somalia, it is trapped in the realm of political negotiation, not public policy. Ministries and local councils depend on donor projects that disappear when funding ends. Without national frameworks for gender equality, civic participation, or youth employment, empowerment becomes temporary — tied to personalities, not principles.
Citizenship Without Agency
Beyond women and youth, the wider Somali population remains politically voiceless. Decision-making is concentrated in the hands of a few elites, while citizens struggle to access justice or influence budgets.
Empowerment should mean that every citizen — man or woman, urban or rural — can demand accountability and participate in shaping national priorities. Yet the system still treats people as clients, not stakeholders.
The Economic Dimension
Empowerment without economic independence is fragile. Somalia’s economy is informal and unequal, offering limited credit or job security. Women entrepreneurs, despite driving local trade, often lack access to finance or legal protection. Donor-funded training sessions come and go, leaving few lasting results.
Real empowerment means linking education, finance, and market access — giving citizens the tools to stand on their own.
Cultural and Social Barriers
Patriarchal traditions and clan loyalties continue to restrict participation. Women in leadership face hostility; youth with new ideas are dismissed as inexperienced. Changing this culture requires civic education and role models who show that leadership is service, not privilege.
Empowerment is not about confrontation — it is about creating social acceptance for equality and merit.
The Way Forward
Somalia’s challenge is not a shortage of ideas, but a shortage of implementation. Empowerment will remain hollow until citizens — not donors or elites — define it. It begins when a woman can open a business without permission, a youth can challenge authority without fear, and a community can plan its future without waiting for aid approval.
That shift requires trust, education, and accountability — the real instruments of empowerment.
Conclusion
Empowerment travels easily across languages and institutions, but it rarely changes realities on the ground. In Somalia, it has too often served politics instead of people.
To give the word meaning again, empowerment must evolve from a borrowed slogan to a social contract — one where power is shared, rights are protected, and every citizen has a voice in shaping the nation’s path.
Only then will the word that travels so well finally begin to change something.
The opinion expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dawan Africa